gps
i know quite a few of you guys use these gps devices and i have been looking around at some models myself looking for the best/cheapest deal
also looking at software for my new phone but unfortunately my new phone is not compatiblep.s its a samsung pixon it does have gps but only for tagging in photos i believe
then i stumbled upon this site
http://freecaddie.com/FAQ.aspx
which leads to the final question in the faq's
and this site
http://www.semsons.com/nosyblgpsres.html
i know its a usa site but that particular model is available in the uk
my question is
1, is this model any good
2, does anybody else have/used this
3, will it work as good as some of the top of range gps models
darren
Reply : Sat 21st Mar 2009 13:11
Darren
Since someone on this site posted about freecaddie.com I have been toying with setting something up. I already have a windows 5 mobile phone from work (HTC S620) and have just bought one of these, it arrived this morning. Cheapest one I could find.
http://www.blahdvd.com/Hw/BTGP-38-Bluetooth-GPS-Receiver-NEMERIX-Chipset/AD-BLUE-GPS/product.htm
I have no idea if it is any good, or if my phone battery will last a whole round.
If you are playing in the winter league at Bondhay on Sunday you can take a look.
John
Reply : Sat 21st Mar 2009 13:12
Darren
Since someone on this site posted about freecaddie.com I have been toying with setting something up. I already have a windows 5 mobile phone from work (HTC S620) and have just bought one of these, it arrived this morning. Cheapest one I could find.
http://www.blahdvd.com/Hw/BTGP-38-Bluetooth-GPS-Receiver-NEMERIX-Chipset/AD-BLUE-GPS/product.htm
I have no idea if it is any good, or if my phone battery will last a whole round.
If you are playing in the winter league at Bondhay on Sunday you can take a look.
John
Reply : Sat 21st Mar 2009 19:44
hi john
yes i will be at bondhay
see you there m8
Last edit : Sat 21st Mar 2009 20:08
Reply : Sun 22nd Mar 2009 17:25
Hi Darren,
I have been using freecaddie since june last year, excellent, and at the right price.
Anyone who already has a GPS device, such as a handheld or mobile phone sat nav which runs on microsoft windows mobile platforms download the free software and install it on your GPS, you will need to register but its all free. Download various courses from the database or create your own. I use an handheld PC (hp iPaq Travel Companion) sat nav and it is spot on for yardage markers. Very impressive and best of all its FREE.
There is already quite an impressive database of courses in the UK and its quite easy to create your own course map using google earth, all the instructions are on the site. I have created quite a few and are quite accurate. If enough of us use it we should cover all the courses we are likely to play.
Reply : Sun 22nd Mar 2009 19:53
I use the Sureshot 8800 & love it. I also had the Skycaddie for a month but got bought the Sureshot as a 'gift' for some work I had done.
There are specs from both I'd like to merge together to create the ultimate GPS but I'm quite happy with the Sureshot. I can score my round & stats hole by hole, it's colour screen & easy to use.
If your unsure go to a golf retailer & ask for a demo.
John.
Reply : Sun 22nd Mar 2009 20:44
John can you do a reveiw on pro's and cons between them including value for money.
Reply : Sun 22nd Mar 2009 20:53
Losing your eyesight and feel then, David, need reassurance on the distance.
Reply : Sun 22nd Mar 2009 21:49
Dave,
I'll PM you a review tomorrow & then if anyone else is interested I may post it on the forums.
Reply : Sun 22nd Mar 2009 23:10
Afraid so John ,If only that was the only thing i'm losing these days.............
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 07:52
JOHN
yes i would like to see the review as well
i assume that some other golfers would as well, so if you could post it in here
would be great
thanx
as for my original post i wont be investing in that model as of yet, for the simple reason that my phone is not windows based, might look into getting one though.
spoke to john flynn at bondhay and saw a demo of his and after the round spoke again to hear that his gps reciever with his phone was working fine and giving accurate yardages to within 1-2 yds of his playing partner who had a sureshot
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 12:13
Another question has now arisen with this
can you get software for a sat nav so instead of roads it will be golf courses
tom tom 1 or similar device perhaps????
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 12:35
Another question has now arisen with this
can you get software for a sat nav so instead of roads it will be golf courses
tom tom 1 or similar device perhaps????
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 14:47
Right, here's my OWN personal opinion on 2 GPS devices that I have owned & used for 4 or more rounds of golf.
Skycaddie SG2.5
This was the 1st of the 2 devices that I used & my preference for choosing this model was at the time of purchase it was £50 cheaper than it's nearest rivals (£149).
On arrival of the unit it had to be charged for a minimum of 5hrs but this could be done whilst it was plugged into the PC. This enabled me to install the software on my PC to 'sync' with the GPS device & also register & activate the device.
In order to be able to use this once it was charged required you to 'sign up' to one of their three annual membership schemes, these range from £19.95 (just UK) up to £39.95 (worldwide).You are then able to choose courses & download them to your device. The SG2.5 can hold 10 courses (more expensive models can hold more).
Once on the course they suggest turning the device on 10mins prior to playing to allow it to get a strong GPS signal. The buttons are easy to use & the menus are quite simple to use. In all fairness you could use this device without having to press a button during your round as it automatically detects which hole your playing (even if your on the wrong fairway!!) so all you need to do is look at the screen.
The screen on the SG2.5 is black & white (it's colour on the more expensive models) & is quite easy to read in sunlight. It gives you distances to the front, middle & back of the green & it also allows you to move the on screen cursor to pin point the exact flag position. If you require more detailed info you can press the 'target' button & it will give details on hazards etc. It will also give you 'lay-up' distances, for example it will display 170yrds leaves 100yrds, this was a feature I thought was really useful on par 5's or long par 4's as I'm quite comfortable playing a full 100yd wedge into a green.
If you want to measure how far your ball travelled you simply press the 'mark' button from your starting position & then again when you reach your end position. This put paid to the theory that your average drive is 260yrds!! You'll be surprised at the actual distance
the size of the unit is quite small & lightweight. you can either clip it onto your bag using the 'belt-clip' which is really good & has the option of a 'quick release' button or it can quite comfortably be carried around in your jacket pocket.
Overview of the skycaddie
Pros : Lightweight, small, black & white version is good value, quick release belt clip & layup yardage.
Cons : Have to pay a subscription before you can use it, can't edit courses already mapped, small(ish) screen
Sureshot 8800
The 2nd of my devices was the Sureshot 8800. This was bought for me as a gift & it cost £199.99, slightly more expensive than the skycaddie.
On arrival of the unit it had to be charged for a minimum of 5hrs & could not be switched on to register etc until fully charged . Once charged I was able to register the device, setup my preferences & download courses.
To use this device straight away did not require any subscriptions as your are entitled to 3 course downloads, I thought this was an excellent idea. The unit itself can store up to 20 courses. You can also 'edit' the courses to take into account any new hazards etc that have been built.
Again to use it on the course they recommend turning it on 10mins prior to playing. There are more buttons than the Skycaddie but this is because it can do a lot more than the skycaddie. The menus are simple & once you have used it a few times they become 2nd nature. I must admit that I did need to read the manual to be able to use all the features but then again I like reading manuals
The screen on the 8800 is colour and is really easy to read in sunlight, even direct sunlight. It gives you distances to the front, middle & back of the green & it also allows you to move the on screen cursor to pin point the exact flag position. If you require more detailed info you can press the up & down keys & it will give colurful detailed images of the hazards (there are that many that they provide a waterproof legend card so you can take it out with you but I've not had to use that yet).
As with the SG2.5 it allows you to measure your distance with the same ease.
Now this is where the sureshot leaves the SG2.5 standing. On every hole you can record fairways hit, greens in regulation, sand saves, up/downs, putts & the final score. After 9 holes you can review your stats on the screen as it gives you a simple screen showing the above. It also shows this after 18holes. It will also save this score so you can download it to your PC later (great if you want to input it into golfshake)
the size of the unit is bigger then the skycaddie & I don't think you could carry it in your pocket. I have been using the beltclip to attach it to my bag which once secured is very sturdy, but would have benefited from the 'quick release' button on the skycaddie as trying to get it off is a bit cumbersome, & more recently using a tie strap (the things you use to secure large items in a car boot or on a roof rack) to secure it to my Powakaddy & it works a treat.
Overview of theSureshot
Pros : Get 3 free courses to download, edit mapped courses, track score & stats, large colour screen.
Cons : Bit too big to carry in your pocket, belt clip bit awkward to get off.So which one would I recommend??
In all honesty there both great units & if I hadn't have had the Sureshot bought as a gift I probably wouldn't have swapped but after trying them both out I would recommend the Sureshot for the following reasons
- you don't need to subscribe to initially use it so if you only play 3 courses you don't need to spend another single penny.
- being able to record your stats, if your out practising you don't need to bother with a scorecard & pencil.
- the sureshot 'sync' software is easier to use.
- the ability to edit courses.
- the larger screen
the only area the sureshot falls down for me is not having the 'lay-up' yardage but I suppose a bit of mental arithmetic can get around that & not having the quick release button on the belt clip is a let down. I have included the links to both websites, & some photos of the sureshot in action, if you require anymore info
Sureshot
Skycaddie
John.Last edit : Wed 25th Mar 2009 09:29
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 15:14
Jonny,
Of the people I know & play with who have these we play quicker. No need to find 150yrd marker & then pace out. Just look at the screen pick club & swing.
I think the people you refer to would just be as slow with a stroke saver & it's not the GPS that's to blame.
I know you have played golf with Dave Ley & he uses one, was this your experience when he used it??
John.
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 16:58
Jonny,
your assuming that all courses have yardgaes on sprinklers? At Conwy there are up to 5 different coloured markers (but yellow can sometime be 100, 150 & 200) on the fairway & unless you have a strokesaver (or a GPS ) you won't know what yardage they are??
Surely taking the time to look for the markers & then working out how far away you are from it is longer than me just looking at my screen & getting the exact yardage???
Why do I feel the need for one, easy really. the same reason we all buy new equipment, to help improve our game.
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 19:14
I am with you 100% Jonny P. You made the argument against pretty solid. Today I had to hit a six iron from 125 yds against a very strong wind to make the green.
I glanced back at the 150 yd marker post on the side of the fairway, guessed the 25 yds and decided on what I thought I needed, took it, played it excatly as I wanted to, and ended up on the green. The gps would probably have given me the same yardage and I would have factored in all the variables and come up with the same shot,but because I don't possess a gps, I have to use what else is available to me. A part of the game that I enjoy very much.
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 19:37
Jonny / John.
I'm not trying to make any argument why you should use one I just posted my opinion on 2 GPS devices because 2 members expressed an interest in them.
b) Even if a you did, once we have the yardage number exactly. We have to tyake off or add on many variables such as (but not limited to) wind speed, wind direction, time of day, time of year, type of grass, green elevation, shot type required (punch, floaty etc), club in hand, how your feeling, type of ball your using..
Surely this all adds to the time taken to decide which club to hit & goes against what you were saying about people taking ages to play their shot? If your a player who really needs to factor in all those varaiables then you must be of a standard where you are very very good & surely you'd want to know the exact yardage?
If you don't like them fair do's but try to except that other people do use them & do like them.
Your argument on why you don't want to use them can easily be used as why someone wouldn't want to use a rescue club, gap wedge, big headed driver, non shank wedges, the list goes on. But the fact is we do & we do it to aid us in making this game a little easier.
John.
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 19:54
I think that if anyone wants to use one then I have no problem at all with it. I am quite sure that if I had one then I would use it. I don't believe that having one slows the game down at all it is the time taken over the shot and the ambling around that makes for slow play.
I froze today, last out and 4 and half hours of waiting for every shot. 40 out, 48 back.
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 20:00
I agree John,
I heard you had a good knock on Friday with Chris, looks like the old form is slowly returning.
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 20:18
Likewsie your argument that they help you can be used as an argument to allow gadgets that read break so one doesn't have to read greens, or a tool that judges wind speed so you know how far left or right to aim.
Not really a valid point as none of those devices exist whereas my examples all do so not really comparing like for like?
In line with this trend of technology, is an alarming decline in the number of people playing golf - is it too weird to put two and two together? The alure of the game to me is that it is so darn difficult - making it easier makes it blander in many respects.
Not sure where your getting your stats from but the last time I looked golf is more popular than ever with more peopke taking up the sport, even to the extent of trying to get it into the olympics!!!
Reply : Mon 23rd Mar 2009 22:53
Giving the yardage to the front, middle and back of the green is hardly going to make you play better golf. Why should the amateur golfer suffer when the tour pro's have the information at their disposal and have done for years not unless i am going to map my course to exact yardages myself.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 08:21
Jonny,
In line with this trend of technology, is an alarming decline in the number of people playing golf - is it too weird to put two and two together? The alure of the game to me is that it is so darn difficult - making it easier makes it blander in many respects.
Is this the article you were referring to?? It only covers Amercia & none of it's research is UK related & none of it's research said the decline was anything to do with technology??
I think the reason for the decline in people playing golf is more to do with the current economical climate that were in.
Martin,
Giving the yardage to the front, middle and back of the green is hardly going to make you play better golf.
Didn't say it would but it makes my club decision a lot easier & helps speed up play.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 09:41
Jonny,
Again you assume wrong
I'm by no means a slow player (ask any of the golfshake members who have played with me) & having a GPS helps improve my game in that if I know I have 165yrds & I can club correctly rather than guessing, getting it wrong which leaves me short or over the back which then leads to more shots taken which increases the time taken to complete the hole.
Before you say "but how do you know how far you hit each club" I'll tell you, last year I spent about 2 months on the practice field hitting 20-30 balls with each club & then measuring the average distance so I have a pretty good understanding. I will need to repeat this as I have just had a new set of clubs.
My comment regarding "it won't make you a better player" was implying that if you have a GPS it won't make you a better ball striker. You still have to hit the ball but knowing the correct distance takes another piece of guesswork out of the equation.
hope that answers your question
ps, can I just add that when I play using my GPS all of my playing partners always say "how far does your thingy say I have??".
Last edit : Tue 24th Mar 2009 09:43
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 10:29
I feel that over the years it is the little things that have been introduced that have had this affect on the speed of play.
At my club in Somerset, which was fairly hilly everyone carried their bag, which is the shortest way round a golf course and by far the quickest. We never had 150 yard markers so never ever thought about them. Eyesight is what was used to determine the distance and it is amazing how one gets the feel for distance, as opposed to known length very quickly.
I still play this way myself. as I do not have fixed distances for every club. I am forced now to play a more strategic game so most of the time I am laying up to my favoured distances, anything from 125 yds in suits me fine.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 11:42
How many times have we seen the professionals discuss the yardage with their caddie taking into account that they supposedly know how far they hit each club and then proceed to hit it through the green, or come up short.
Knowing the exact yardage to the pin is, of course a great help as is how far on the green the pin is positioned but for any given distance there will most probably be a range of three clubs to choose from depending on how the players actually sees the shot.
I get bewildered when I see high handicappers blast their wedges over the green, this tells me that they have no eye or feel for the distance, which is vital for good scoring.
I also agree with jonny P that there is a decline in the numbers playing now, probably because there are now too many courses vying for the business. I much preferred it in the days when golfers joined golf clubs and played most of their golf at the club. Playing new courses, although nice to do, does not really help to maintain decent form because every course will have greens that are completely different to what one is used to.
The greens are the most important part of a golf course, without quality greens scoring becomes difficult. Just imagine the pros trying to play on the greens that we are subjected to these days. They would have a fit.
Last edit : Tue 24th Mar 2009 11:43
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 12:30
JP
your comment on being bewildered by players blasting wedges over the green
my situation on sunday at bondhay
as with different variations in weather conditions i had 165yds to the center of a green
knowing roughly how far i can hit each iron and with the wind being behind us i decided to hit a 9iron to which that went sailing through the green
and 2 holes later same situation but int the wind same distance i hit a 5iron and came up short
i agree some of the higher handicap players might not have the sasme feel for the game but to be fair they may strike the ball better on some occasions than others
maybe it was the same for me but i felt like i had the correct club each time and had a good strike
and as you have stated even the pros can do exactly the same thing so does that mean that they dont have the feel as well.
i originally started this thread on gps devices as i was thinking of getting one mainly to help me judge the distance to the greens and hazards as you can never rely on yellow/white/red stakes on some course so for me a gps would speed my game up as i wouldnt be looking for the markers all the time
in my 18yrs of playing/hacking around a golf course i have never known anyone go to a course they have never played with no yardage markers and just "judged the distance/club" just by looking at wha they think they should be using, if this has been the case then my opinion is that it is more luck than judgment
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 12:59
But, my pont is that I don't go by what it tells me all the time. There are so many other factors I actually just go through my usual routine in assesing what I need to do, put simply, I just look and feel.
I agree you have to take other factors into account, you'd be a fool to think that you can take your 150yrd club into a 20mph wind against you.#
Despite what John said - the game is failing to attract the numbers it used to, you just have to play in American to see why - everyone drives around, they order food half way around, they use computers to judge everything - it's just watering down the game. All these little improvements add up.
this isn't necessarily the case for the UK?
I also agree with jonny P that there is a decline in the numbers playing now, probably because there are now too many courses vying for the business. I much preferred it in the days when golfers joined golf clubs and played most of their golf at the club. Playing new courses, although nice to do, does not really help to maintain decent form because every course will have greens that are completely different to what one is used to.
Are you saying that there is a decline in people joining clubs or a decline in people playing golf??
John.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 13:02
Darren, you have only confirmed what I said in the first place, in that knowing the yardage is not much use if one doies not have a feel for distance, which encompasses all the little vagueries that can affect a golf shot. I could never hit a nine iron 165 yds even downwind, but as you said there are many high handicappers who can give the ball a good wallop, I played with one last week at my club, Chris Perry.
There are not many pros these days that have the flair and the imagination of someone like Seve. They all rely on a methodical repeating swing. All of them strike the ball excveptionally well, as we would expect of them, the difference between them is the abilty to score well when the striking is not that good and to also have an exceptional short game combined with an excellent putting stroke that can hole out under pressure.
18 years it has taken you to find that person who has never bought a yardage chart in his life and has always trusted his eyesight. Luck, certainly can play a part in golf, sometimes even bad luck, but it is easy to blame poor play on things other than ones own shotmaking decisions.
I will arrive at Wokefield for the first time for the NvS and once on the first tee I will start to absorb all the information I feel I will need to enable me to play each hole to the best of my abilities, which at the present time are pretty dodgy. But hope springs eternal, as they say.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 13:42
I don't think that gps slows the game down even though I don't own one. My only time I get to look at them is when they are on the buggy and are working. Interestingly I can be parked at a tee and the yardage will be different to what the card says and also diferent to my friends personal sureshot. So they all have their problems.
Slow play has only become noticeable since the introduction of all these new USGA courses that have been built in the past twenty years or so. Very few have the ninth coming back to the clubhouse, there are many long walks between greens and tees (Poor design) and even though we always seem to play off the yellows we still have to walk the full distance of the course, and, as we all know they all seem to be 7000 yards long.
Every new course is called a championship course, which means absolutely nothing. Wentworth is famous because one sees it on the TV holding major tournamenmts yet there are five clubs within 15 miles that are a much sterner test for the professionals and are never heard of. The whole game now is based on hype, from the courses to the equipment, which is a great shame.
A fourball at my club in Somerset would be a three hour experience, all carrying our own bags. All the Open tournaments I used to play in had a minimum field of 72 players and we played 36 holes, had lunch in between and all in the clubhouse in time for the presentation. This is not achievable today. Why? I just don't know.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 13:53
I tend to select my club by eye rather than yardage markers/books. I tend to step up to the ball, decide what club I need to get me to where I want to be based on having an eye for the distance and the club required, pull it out the bag and hit it. Sometimes I get it wrong, usually by taking too much club, but 8 times out of 10 I'm not far away.
I do use the yardage markers for verification if they are within 10-20 yards of my ball, and course planners get used on courses I don't know so that I know where the hazards are. I also refer to course planners when I want to lay up to see where the best spot would be that takes the danger out of the equation. I will admit that if someone with me has a GPS I will ask them what it says out of interest, but I'm normally within 5% with my estimate.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 14:32
We all get it wrong at times, Chris, but we learn from it. Your overall game impressed me very much, a little tweaking and you should come right down.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 19:38
John Flood
I was sticking up for you hence the reason i said "why should the amateur golfer suffer.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 20:03
Jonny P
I never said they use GPS if you read it correctly, i said they had all the correct information at their disposal
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 20:19
John Flood
Thank you very much spending the time to give me and others the information about the two products you discussed, it has been very helpfull as i am going to purchace one soon. I like the idea that you don't have to pay a subscription.
How many times have i hooked the ball onto the next fairway and then had to run across to see a yardage marker, plenty let me tell you,and i have played golf for a long time, and this will speed up my game no end plus i can get an accurate distance of what i hit every club using the ball mark.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 21:15
Martin,
I'm glad that you appreciate my effort & hope it makes your decision a little easier. I'm in the process of updating the review with some more photo's of the 8800 (can't do it for the skycaddie as I don't have it anymore)
Jonny,
I really can't see how GPS speeds up play unless your doing something wrong...
If you as a player never look for the yardage markers & then use these to work out your yardage then I agree GPS won't speed up your play but I can't imagine any player not having to do this?
John, can you help us - what was your average round time before & after GPS?
I can only comment on rounds where I have been playing as a single (practice rounds) as I can't control the playing speed of playing partners. I would say that before using a GPS I would take about 1hr 30mins to play 9 holes & with the GPS it's about 1hr 10mins.
Reply : Tue 24th Mar 2009 22:06
Nice review John thanks for taking the time.
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 00:01
martin
How many times have i hooked the ball onto the next fairway and then had to run across to see a yardage marker, plenty let me tell you,and i have played golf for a long time, and this will speed up my game no end plus i can get an accurate distance of what i hit every club using the ball mark.
hmmm to be honest im not sure if gps would help in this situation, 1 thing i have noticed with some of my playing partners is that when you hit your ball onto another fairway (especially if its the next hole that runs in the oposite direction) then the gps automatically updates itself to think that its actually playing the next hole (or whichever hole you have strayed onto)
also i agree with above comments thanks to john for the reviews
BUT
NOBODY YET HAS ANSWERED MY ORIGINAL POST
oh well
i will have to keep trawling the market and get debates like this going on other forums
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 08:36
Darren,
Both the skycaddie & the sureshot will help in the situation if you stray onto another fairway. With the sureshot you have to use the keys to move to the next hole & with the skycaddie if it thinks you have finished the previous hole but it is unsure it will ask you to confirm "Hole no2?"
As for your original question you have to take into account using a PDA or windows phone the following;
- does it have built in GPS, if not you will have to carry a GPS bluetooth receiver.
- if it does are you charged by your mobile provider for using GPS?
- will using the GPS have a drastic effect on the battery life?
- if other players see you messing with a mobile on the course they might think your making a call & 'report' you.
- will it work in direct sunlight.
I asked all these before I bought mine & thought that having a device that is built for the sole purpose of golf GPS was better than messing around with mobiles. My opinion.
John.
Last edit : Wed 25th Mar 2009 08:37
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 08:53
JOHN
thanx, yes i think your correct a specific golf gps would be better
after speaking to john flyn after the bondhay round his mobile battery went flat walking up the 18th fairway
wil have to sweet talk the other half to buy me one for my birthday in april
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 08:55
JOHN
thanx, yes i think your correct a specific golf gps would be better
after speaking to john flyn after the bondhay round his mobile battery went flat walking up the 18th fairway
wil have to sweet talk the other half to buy me one for my birthday in april
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 10:34
jonny,
the 20mins saved was not just saving me time working out yardages but also saving me time from not having to play extra shots either because I was coming up short or going over the back of greens.
As you said you assume that your going to hit the fairways but what if you stray to another fairway & you can't see the yardage markers??
Were never going to agree on this so I'll agree to disagree
PS I've updated the review for those of you who read it the first time.
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 12:11
Jonny,
i measured all my club distances the old fashioned way with a trundle wheel!! you should have seen peoples faces when they saw me walking up & down the practice area with the wheel!!
I intend doing it for my new clubs with the GPS.
Last edit : Wed 25th Mar 2009 12:19
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 18:49
Hi John
Thanks for all the information you provided,much appreciated and going to go for the sureshot as i think it just gives you a little more information,colour screen and no subsctiption fee.
Cheers Martin
Reply : Wed 25th Mar 2009 19:44
This relates to Darren's initial question.
I had a Windows Mobile device, bought a GPS bluetooth dongle and tried some software and as previously mentioned the accuracy could be upto 8 yards out. I now have a G1 and similar to Jonny's point above about iphones, I've heard the GPS accuracy on these can also be hit and miss.
Therefore anyone know what the accuracy of a specific golf GPS is like ? and technically if they are accurate why are they more accurate than mobile phones/PDAs ?
I do believe you can increase the mobile phone accuracy by adding mast triangulation so that you use GPS and the mobile masts to increase accuracy to within 2 yards but again as someone mentioned above phones lack battery power for a full round at present.
Regards, Darren.
Reply : Thu 26th Mar 2009 09:30
Allan,
Thanks for the info. I thought the caddie's also used the GPs but I'm not sure if there only allowed in practice rounds??
I agree with all your comments.
Reply : Thu 26th Mar 2009 17:56
Current GPS would not satisfy tour pro's as it's not accurate enough for tournament play, The current sat tech being used at the momment is only accurate to 5mtrs which is the average length of a car,good enough for us hackers but not the Pro's. Thats why when a couple of you have them your readings vary by a couple of yrds.
Thats why the pro's like caadieaid as its more accurate as its actualy photo mapping and you can measure point to point as on google earth.
"no GPS use in tournament play"
That is also correct as I have pro caddied and you map the course in the practice rounds only.
Jonny you know you are going to have to get one.lol.
Last edit : Thu 26th Mar 2009 17:57
Reply : Thu 26th Mar 2009 17:56
There is another device just out on the market which does exactly what the caddyaid does & tracks scores similar to the sureshot & it comes preloaded with 20,000 courses so you don't need to download or subscribe.
I'm looking for the product & will paste the link when I find it.
Found it. look here
Last edit : Thu 26th Mar 2009 18:01
Reply : Sun 29th Mar 2009 09:31
I installed FreeCaddie onto my mobile (running win6.1) earlier this week, added a course to the database which took about 10 mins and then used it yesterday. It worked great!....One of my playing partners had a Sky Caddie and we compared yardages a few times on the way round - the differences were minor, only a yard or two mostly upto a maxium of five yards on one approach.
Also as it was very windy yesterday my power-fade took me to onto some parallel fairways and some parts of the course I've never seen before! The FreeCaddie sofware was great for these situations.
Reply : Sun 29th Mar 2009 21:28
Yet more technology 'pushing the envelope'.
a) why should you have an advantage (whether or not you can select and execute the shot to said yardage).
b) Even if you do execute the shot, it's not been derived from your own judgement.
c) why should you hold people up. I can't believe that using one makes it anythiing other than slowing the flow of play.
d) as John Pettit mentions: strolling down the fairway you know more or less what you've got left from the 150 yd marker (granted in Euope it's 150 mtrs but just add 15%)
e) What next, the radar putter from Caddyshack?
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 11:35
Yet more technology 'pushing the envelope'.
a) why should you have an advantage (whether or not you can select and execute the shot to said yardage). so are you saying stroke savers should not be allowed also??
b) Even if you do execute the shot, it's not been derived from your own judgement. regardless of if you know the correct yardage you STILL have to play the shot, I would imagine having a 2 handicapper & 24 handicapper having the exact yardage would have different outcomes to the end result
c) why should you hold people up. I can't believe that using one makes it anythiing other than slowing the flow of play. you obviousley have never played with one or played with people who use them
d) as John Pettit mentions: strolling down the fairway you know more or less what you've got left from the 150 yd marker (granted in Euope it's 150 mtrs but just add 15%) what if your on a different fairway or not even on a fairway, how do you derive the yardage then??
e) What next, the radar putter from Caddyshack? do you know something we don't??
Last edit : Mon 30th Mar 2009 11:35
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 12:48
John, you obviously feel strongly about this. I on the other hand feel that if you want to play a course then play it using your own skill and judgment. I can't say anymore than that really. I wouldn't say that I don't mind other people using them in competition because not all people can afford to use them. On a friendly level I find them a bit laughable.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 12:59
Oooo its all kickin off again
Its kind of a novelty Item, I have used the in built buggy GPS before, and only really used it for measuring my drive (yes - bit vague)
I dont have a problem with people using them, but personally would prefer to use my own judgement.
I buy a course guide at every new course I play, use it that day, and then dont bother. I have a memory to tell me that it has bunkers etc.
but hey, maybe I'm old fashioned
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 13:26
Patrick
I on the other hand feel that if you want to play a course then play it using your own skill and judgment.
Try telling that to Tiger! Tell him he can't take his caddie out with next time?
I don't feel strongly I just get a bit annoyed when people 'slag' them off or make statments about them when they haven't used one so don't have the experience as those who have & therefore can make a judgment based on that.
jonny,
But...John, you (and others) often justify any advantage with the oft-heard comment "you still have to play the shot". Would you therefore be open to a device that reads greens for you?
I wouldn't say NO as I'm very open minded but I would have to use one to see if it was of any benefit.
I can imagine someone like yourself making a comment a few years back saying "would you be open to using a 480cc driver??"
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 13:49
John, what has Tiger Woods got to do with it? Don't compare his game with ours.
You do feel strongly about it and I'm not slagging it off, I'm making a constructive criticism about how golf is becoming easier. Not knowing the exact yardage is a pressure which if I was in matchplay would be miffed that my opponent (no matter his handicap) took that out of the equation.
You can justify all you like but you're using an artificial aid.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 13:54
There is no advantage , to play a shot you either use yardage or feel if it's yardage you look at some "technoligy" , course planner or you pace it out ,which everyone is entitled to do. If your a feel player good on you and just because I know the yardage does'nt mean I dont feel the shot .
Jonny that comment is not to justify its a fact, I can't see what the hang up is with them( I know you havn't) it's not like you can't get the yardage from other means, unless you are on a course with no markers and they are about.
Patrick try 10% in Europe or you may over shoot the green.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 14:12
David, I'm sorry but there is an advantage, and a perceived advantage, why on earth do you think they sell so many.
Feel has nothing to do with it
Mind you, you're right about the 15%...where did I get that from? me an accountant too.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 14:46
They sell so many because of poorly marked golf courses, and the cost of buying and keeping loads of course planners, especially if you play many courses and don't forget the marketing hype as with most golf equipment it won't make the slightest difference to the majority of players,but they have to have it. For instance even on my own course the green staff pull the 150 mkrs(they are steel tubes with a metal spike) whilst cutting the grass and then replace them where they think they were unfortunately, they have no concept of feel for distance.When you own one you soon realise some course just pick a yardage out of the air .As for advantage I have used one for a year now and my hcp is very much stagnant,you still have to put that ball in the hole to score. Try one then judge if it's that much of an advantage we will soon have you back in single figures.
.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 15:28
Patrick
How can you make a constructive critique if you've never used one?? Why would you be miffed if your partner had one, would you feel the same way if he had a stroke saver?? would you feel the same if he had a remote controlled trolley? would you feel the same if he had oversize very easy to hit irons?? the list can go on......I'm not trying to justify anything, I'll use one regardless of what you or anyone thinks, they have been approved by the R&A (via local ruling) so I'm within my rights.
What type of golf equipment do you use?? I bet at least £10 that one of your clubs utilises some sort of new technology???
& I also bet if we played together & a neutral course I would be ready to play my 2nd shot quicker than you would be (in reference to your point c earlier)
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 16:34
John, why would I need to use one? The benefit, sorry advantage, is clear to see.
Look, I'm not into point scoring and if you refuse to believe it's an artificial aid then there's no point in prolonging this as you cannot be persuaded. I'm not a technophobe as my daughter bought me a square driver 420 for x'mas and I use that (up until then I played with a 1970's Wilson 1200 still use it, a Ping 1 iron and Taylor made blades, it's on my profile...but I'm not a purist) but that is beside the point.
You continue to use one, it's your right and I'll continue to frown about it as that's mine.
Last edit : Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:20
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 16:36
Jonny,
All I'll say is times change. For every player you can get to agree with you I bet I can find a player who agrees with me.
It's not futile to compare golf club technology to GPS. They are both pieces of golf equipment that have been designed using the latest technology to aid decision making or helping to hit the golf ball. Regardless of if the technolgy is taken out on the course, that's like me saying "I'll use my GPS device to create my own strokesaver giving accurate yardage & marking spots every 15yrds & then leave the GPS at home & take the booklet out with me" the point is they have been created using technology.
Artificial Intelligence (as Wikipedia)- Artificial intelligence (AI) is the intelligence of machines and the branch of computer science which aims to create it. Major AI textbooks define the field as "the study and design of intelligent agents,"[1] where an intelligent agent is a system that perceives its environment and takes actions which maximize its chances of success.
The GPS does not take any action & does not learn from one shot to the other, it just displays a number!!
Sure, I am not stupid, I know it's effectively telling you the same thing as a small paper book, or a wooden post, but it's the way it obtains and relays that information which is hugely different. That is the issue most of us have. How do you think this information was obtained in the first place??.......GPS
The one thing I don't think many understand is that I (and I am sure I speak for some others) is that golf is a chance to get away from computers and electronic devices in general. They surround us all the time and they have become a massive part of human life. this is probably why we don't see eye to eye on this, I embrace technology, work & play with it
Last edit : Mon 30th Mar 2009 16:43
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 16:55
I love it Jonny , you know you are going to get one.LOL.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 17:27
please correct me if I'm wrong here,
GPS uses Satellite/s to triangulate your position on the earths surface. Now these are approx 36000Km above the earths surface, and the average accuracy of "good" GPS is +/- 2 yds.
Now the way I understand it, this does not to take into account several variables:-
Wind, temperature, elevation/topographics (in the close proximity), ground saturation levels, precipitation and whether you are on fairway or rough.
So, your GPS says 150 yds to the center of the green,
Its windy, cold and raining a bit. However, it rained quite heavily in the last 2 days and you are in a slight dip in the first cut of rough where water accumulates due to a high water table. the ball is 2 inches below your feet and the level of the green is 12 feet above you, and it looks like 140 yds.
Does GPS really help in your club selection, or are you gonna go with what you feel?
I go with feel, but if your £200 bit of Kit can tell you the right club.
Go for it.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 17:37
I use it all the time. Par fours that I know I cannot reach in two become three shotters so it does not matter what club I take for the first two shots. the Third, as long as it is within 120 yds I know instinctively what to play.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 17:41
I've just written a very long and articulate reply but wasn't logged in and so it was lost. Grrr.
School boy error Jonny.....how many of us have done that??
Exactly right Simon ,you are going to go with what you feel I hit my 8 iron 150yrds I'm not going to use that if all the variables tell me differently. If I personally though of it as an artifical aid i would not use it but as it is only telling me the info i can obtain from other sources which are currently within the rules I'm fine with it.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:22
You need to get out more Jonny......I suspect you might find a picture of Mr Hogan with a GPS in his hands.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:27
Dear GPS users, do you take your gps unit up to the podium when you've won a competition?
Only Joking.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:28
I still use eyesight and feel, the only way I know how to play.
I played in the Corfu Amateur chanpionships in the eighties and I had a practice round with one of the American competitiors. Hiis name was Geret Kuiken and he played off 7.
We both drove off at the first and I was longer than him so I watched him play and was just about to play my shot when he bawled out, "John, you've got 64 and half yards to the pin". That stopped me in my tracks as this was the first time I had come across someone who measured how far it was to go, when I barely even looked at the yardage of a hole.
He proceeded to shout in my ear the yardage for every shot I had to play, but I let it go in one ear and out the other.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:50
That was a great drive John, not even I need GPS for 64 and a half yrds.lol.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:06
There was a time, David, when I could drive a ball like you. I know it's hard to imagine, but trust me.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:37
John, why would I need to use one? The benefit, sorry advantage, is clear to see. I don't see how you can 100% say that if you have never used one, that's a very negative attitude
Look, I'm not into point scoring and if you refuse to believe it's an artificial aid then there's no point in prolonging this as you cannot be persuaded. I'm not a technophobe as my daughter bought me a square driver 420 for x'mas and I use that (up until then I played with a 1970's Wilson 1200 still use it, a Ping 1 iron and Taylor made blades, it's on my profile...but I'm not a purist) but that is beside the point. So I assume that by using the technology advanced square driver it has improved / helped your game? But just by putting this in your hands didn't improve your accuracy or yardage, you still had to execute the correct shot
You continue to use one, it's your right and I'll continue to frown about it as that's mine. As I said earlier, I'll use one regardless of anyone's opinion
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:45
Don't worry for tomorrow, John, I have arranged for a Sputnik to hover over the course so that you will have a good signal.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:47
Jonny,
John - it's not the information I disagree with. I keep saying that.
It's how you obtain that info during a round. So your saying that just because I look at a screen instead of something written down it's wrong??
It's artificial intelligence and computers being used during a round. As in my previous post it's not AI it just displays a number, it doesn't make any club suggestion, it doesn't take into account any weather condition, read the link I posted to see what AI is.
It's the precident it sets, the precident of using a computer to make a 'live' decision; not the yardage it gives. This is also why the R&A have reservations. But by allowing it via a local rule they are condoning it.They are concerned about wind meassuring devices which is the next natural progression and can alreay be added to gps units. Can't really comment as it's not happening
There was a day I was like you - open minded to everything to make golf 'better' but after 10 years or so, the more I play the simpler I like the game to be. Your opinion & I respect that.
The one thing I don't think many understand is that I (and I am sure I speak for some others) is that golf is a chance to get away from computers and electronic devices in general. They surround us all the time and they have become a massive part of human life
I embrace technology as much as anyone - never without my ipod, or my iphone - work on a computer 10 hours every day etc, use GPS in my car... But I also find pleasure in being without such items and are happy to have some disconnection once in a while..
So it's just technology in golf you disagree with then?
We don't see eye to eye on this becasue we just view golf differently. We have different attitudes which is healthy. Although in the general sense of the word I am not one, compared to you I would be a purist - I certainly wouldn't be open to a green reading machine like you Again I said I would look at it, if it existed, & make a judgment then. the glass is half full, not half empty
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:48
Nice one John,
I had packed my 30ft aerial just in case
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:54
As every golfer will tell you, you gotta use the rules to your advantage
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:05
Whether you agree or not have your vote, currently the vote is 60% in favour of GPS devices.
http://www.golf-monthly.co.uk/polls.html
Jonny, you can only vote once (from the same computer!!)
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:14
I find this argument a bit silly,i used to think like you Jonny but have changed my mind over the last few years,it's all progress as long as it dosn't go to far.
I played with a 16 handicap golfer two years ago and he was a big slicer of the ball with every single club until he had the driver in his hands (Callaway square) which he straight on almost every shot which i could't beleive,to me i thought "that's like cheating" but the enjoyment factor it gave him was fantastic,he knows like the rest of us he is not going to make a living from the game so what's the harm.
I will agree with you on one point,it is a big advantage using a gps on the course, well to me at least, i play to scratch and i am a bit short sited and although i have glasses i can not play with them on and i am certainly not going to touch my eyeballs to put contacts in LOL, all your getting is the yardage you still have to hit the shot.
It is with out doubt that GPS speeds my game up, I have played at the championship course at Carnoustie a few times and i have had to wait for my friend to play his shot and then come over to give me a yardage, if i used GPS at that time i would have been at the green before i even played my second but playing such a lovely course i am certainly not going to guess what yardage.
From 120 yards in it will never comes out the bag as i agree it's all down to feel.
The way i see it is GPS going to bring a 17 handicaper down 5 shots the answer no but is modern equipment the answer yes.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:27
I posted the definition for you once already. Even so, it's still a computer and still a machine that gives you data - it's name is irrelevant.
you say you don't mention screens but you keep going on about computers which as far as I am aware all have screen, that is why I keep making the point.
I was replying to Patrick earlier but you felt the need to post again which is your right but please don't moan at me for then responding to your posts!?!?!?!
Last edit : Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:30
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:40
if he is against them why does he use one pre-round? perhaps he & steve know how to use them better then other caddies / players in preperation for the tournament??
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:43
I think TGiger has no desire to level the playing field, because the Pros are, in the main, pretty mechanical in their actions. They like the repetitive actions they use as they are reliable. These actions are well suited to those who know the exact yardages they carry each club under different conditions. They don't have the flair and determination that he seems to be able to display when under pressure and he does not wish them to have an aid that will help them more than it wil help him. He does not play golf that way at all.
Reply : Mon 30th Mar 2009 21:23
I have one of the Snooper SatNavs which comes with free golf GPS
So I can use the SatNav on the road and then use it for distances on the golf course.
It has no gimmicks so all it will show you is the front, middle and back of the green, and the distance to any hazards.
You cannot record your scores and you have to work out how far your drive is by subtracting the starting distance from the finish distance.
Russ
Reply : Tue 31st Mar 2009 08:54
I'll bow out of this as it's obviously stalemate, any points being made now have no or v little validity. Good luck to all you gps users, make sure you're legal before a comp. but don't get miffed if people take the piss when they see you using one.
Reply : Wed 1st Apr 2009 08:49
Jonny,
I applaud you for trying it & giving it a go. If it's not for you then fair do's but at least now you can see it from both views.
John.
Reply : Fri 3rd Apr 2009 23:45
It's been such an interesting debate to read, why not try and win one for free
Reply : Sat 11th Apr 2009 21:54
PGA Measures Up For Golf Revolution
The Professional Golfers' Association (PGA) is set to become a trailblazer in tournament golf after rubber-stamping the use of electronic rangefinders in all its events including national championships.
The radical move by The Professional Golfers' Association could pave the way to a golfing revolution across the world as leading tours attempt to tackle the bugbear of slow play which frequently sees rounds stretch well past the five-and-a-half-hour mark.
Among the high profile PGA tournaments where rangefinders will be allowed are the Irish PGA Championship, won last year by defending Open champion Padraig Harrington, the Scottish PGA Championship and the Glenmuir PGA Professional Championship.
Approval for use of all distance measuring devices was agreed at the PGA's executive committee meeting with other leading golf bodies expected to monitor closely the success of the scheme.
The decision to give the green light to rangefinders followed a successful trial at last year's PGA Fourball Championship. More than 100 of the finalists carried them with 55 of 78 pros quizzed responding positively with many citing how their use sped up yardage calculations and the decision making process.
They have also been used with a wide degree of success on the PGA Europro Tour and PGA chief executive Sandy Jones welcomed the decision.
"I'm aware a number of traditionalists might well be appalled by this decision but the evidence suggests that using rangefinders really helps improve pace of play so it is difficult to see why such a decision should be detrimental to the game," he said.
"Slow play in professional and amateur golf has increasingly become an issue and we've taken the decision to embrace technology in a bid to resolve this problem and increase enjoyment of the game.
"The single biggest advantage of rangefinders is that you can take an accurate yardage from any point on the golf course - whether you're ideally placed in the middle of the fairway or stuck in trouble in the trees.
"As we see slow play is often caused by golfers straying into trouble and the caddie or player then having to pace off the yardages. With rangefinders it saves all the fiddling about and consultation of the yardage book, hence speeding up play."
Reply : Sun 12th Apr 2009 21:58
Paul,
I agree that could be a solution for the pro scene, although actually imposing them would be difficult.
For the amatuer scene I don't see how this would work, especially at club level so anything that speeds play should be encouraged.
The phrase "can of worms" springs to mind
Reply : Wed 15th Apr 2009 19:42
I am with Ben, the modern game is alll about technology, but even with all this at their disposal how many did we see through the greens at Augusta.
Reply : Wed 15th Apr 2009 21:16
yes john and to think those greens are twice the size that we play on, well they looked it anyway